Legal Opinion
United States v. Vendetti
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 3, 1940No. 6991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is an action against a surety on a recognizance bond, given in a criminal proceeding. Defendant admits that she entered into a written recognizance as alleged, but sets up facts which she contends exonerate her from all liability on the instrument.
I find the facts of the case to be as stipulated by the parties in an agreed statement of facts, filed at the time of hearing. From this statement, it appears that—
A recognizance was given by Armando Pagliaro (the principal) on May 20, 1936, before a United States Commissioner in this District, and the defendant Ersilia…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. KelleherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Peckham v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. LiakasNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Commonwealth v. THE STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Continental Casualty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.