Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taylor v. United Broadcasting Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1948No. 687Published

1DissentClagett, Associate Judge

While I concur in that portion of the opinion of the court relating to the inappropriateness of a “motion for directed verdict” in cases tried by the court without a jury, I do not agree with the decision nor with the effect of a motion under Rule 37(b) of the Municipal Court rules.

The applicable part of this rule provides:

“After the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant, without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  4. Schad v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  5. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API