XTO Energy Inc. v. Smith Production Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1DissentEva M. Guzman, Justice
The majority concludes that a receiving party cannot change its election within thirty days after receipt of the notice because the Notice Period expires upon the earlier of (a) thirty days after receipt of the Notice, or (b) the date on which the receiving party responds. Because I do not believe this interpretation is consistent with the contracts’ language, which is ambiguous at best, I respectfully dissent.
I. Applicable PRINCIPLES of Contract Construction
In determining whether the language of a contract is ambiguous, we look to the contract as a whole, in light of the circumstances…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.