Legal Opinion

Puleo v. Broad Street Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1979No. 488 and 489PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from the entry of a judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant-appellees on the grounds that plaintiff-appellant’s cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations.

Plaintiff’s action was commenced on April 13, 1976 by the filing of a praecipe for summons in trespass against Broad Street Hospital and Dr. Eugene Spitz. By complaint thereafter filed, the plaintiff, Louis D. Puleo, charged that unnecessary surgery had been performed on his back on May 30, 1973 and again on June 8,1973. Spitz and the Hospital filed separate answers in which they…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Lehner v. MONTGOMERYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stein v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Moore v. McComseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Tanner v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Donnelly v. DeBourkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Coyne v. Porter-Hayden Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API