Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Porter-Hayden Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. 2038 and 2318PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

These consolidated appeals arise from wrongful death and survival actions brought by plaintiff-appellant. In two separate orders, the lower court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants Porter-Hayden Company, Melrath Gasket and Supply Company, Crane Packing Company, and Johns-Manville Products Corporation (defendants) and additional defendant Amatex Corporation (Amatex) on the ground that the actions were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Plaintiff contends that the statutes do not bar her actions. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Smith v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Blumer v. DorfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Di Sante v. Russ Financial Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Lee v. MihalichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. O'brien, Ann C. v. Eli Lilly & Company E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. The Upjohn Company, and Winthrop Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API