Legal Opinion
Davis v. United States Gauge
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 17, 1994No. 92-1273-PFKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, Chief Judge.
This is a product liability case. Richard Davis claims he was using his employer’s welder when it exploded, injuring Davis’ eyes and person. Prior to the explosion, Davis states he had replaced the welder’s 4,000 psi (pounds per square inch) gauge with a new gauge his employer had purchased. Davis and his wife filed suit against United States Gauge (U.S. Gauge) and Victor Equipment Company (Victor). The plaintiffs seek recovery pursuant to theories of negligence, strict liability, and breach of implied warranty. Davis’ wife also filed a loss…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Lindquist v. Ayerst Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Long v. United States Brass Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Reiss v. Komatsu America Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
- McQuivey v. Fulmer Helmets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014