Farzley v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Section 4912, Code 1923, contains a provision not in section 7329 of the Code of 1907. There was added "or having reasonable grounds for believing that it has been stolen."
As we understand the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case, it is that the offense is not proven unless the defendant knows that the goods are stolen, but that a conviction may be sustained if the defendant has reasonable grounds for believing that the goods had been stolen, upon the idea that such "reasonable grounds" are sufficient upon which to predicate a finding by the jury as a legitimate inference that such…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Griggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- State v. AldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ashurst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Ex Parte WallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Goodman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.