Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Koenig

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 23, 1906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — No». D. D. Fisher, Judge. (1) (a) A void law is no law' — ex nihilo, nihil fit.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — No». D. D. Fisher, Judge. (1) (a) A void law is no law' — ex nihilo, nihil fit. Ex parte Nielson, 131 U. S. 182; Strong v. Daniel, 5 Ind. 348;. Sumner v. Beeler, 50 Ind. 341; Astrom v. Hammond, 3 McLean (U. S.) 107; Woolsey v. Bank, 6 McLean (U. S.) 142; Detroit v. Martin, 34 Mich. 170; Kelly v. Bemis, 4 Gray 83; Clark v. Miller, 54 N. Y. 528; Meagher v. Storey Co., 5 Nev. 244; Ex parte Rosenblatt, 19 Nev. 439; Ex parte Siebold, 100 U. S. 371; Ex parte Smith, 135 Mo. 223; Cooley Const. Lim. (6 Ed.), 222; Couch v. Kansas City, 127 Mo. 438; Douglas v.…

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

The original petition in this case was a suit in equity to prevent the defendant Koenig from collecting and paying into the treasury of the city of St. Louis fees allowed by statute to the probate judge for the transaction of probate business in the city of St. Louis, and to prevent the city of St. Louis from receiving such moneys, on the ground that the Act of March 20,1897, providing that the judge of said probate court of the city of St. Louis should thereafter receive a salary instead of the fees allowed by the statute, was unconstitutional and void. To that bill a demurrer was interposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Mayfield v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Ex parte NeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Champ Spring Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Hayes v. ManningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Hess Warming & Ventilating Co. v. Burlington Grain Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. Copper Belle Mining Co. v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Kinsey v. MesserlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API