Legal Opinion
Sneddon v. ABF Freight Systems
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 26, 2007No. Civil 05-CV-2374-L(JMA)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [doc. # 15] and DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT
LORENZ, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment or in the alternative, for summary adjudication. The.motion has been fully briefed and the Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).
Summary Judgment Standard
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 empowers the court to enter summary judgment on factually unsupported claims or defenses. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Bank of Arizona v. ThrustonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Dickson v. Burke Williams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Chisolm v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.