Legal Opinion

State v. Hervey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. M302770; CA A30327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of statements he made to the arresting officer, in refusing to allow the testimony of a defense witness and in refusing to admit a defense exhibit. We affirm.

We take the facts from the pretrial hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress. Officer Luher testified that he stopped defendant’s car after observing it weave back and forth over the center line. He smelled a strong odor of alcohol on defendant’s breath. He…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armijo v. State Ex Rel. Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. LindquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API