Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 6, 1985No. M3 44; CA A29648PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of statements that he made to the police both before and after he was advised of his Miranda rights and in denying his motion to suppress evidence of his refusal to take a breath test. We affirm.
Sheriffs deputies received a report of an accident. When they arrived at the scene, they found a vehicle off the road. No one was in or near it. They saw a pair of crutches inside. The deputies asked their dispatcher to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PreeceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. BaumeisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.