People v. Maupins
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. T. L. Lewis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was convicted upon an information filed August 11, 1915, charging him with the crime of mayhem.
He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The fact that the court refused to give certain instructions requested by defendant is assigned as prejudicial error. An examination of the oral charge made by the court to the jury discloses that the substance of these requested instructions was fully covered therein; hence there was no necessity for repetition. (People v. Williams, 32 Cal. 280; People v. Strong, 30 Cal. 151.) Appellant, while conceding this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Wong HingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. CryderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Pueblo v. Salgado VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1966
- State v. FromkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.