Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 30, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 93-0162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

The State appeals from the Maricopa County Superior Court’s denial of special action relief sought from rulings in the Phoenix City Court. The issue presented in this appeal is whether Motor Vehicle Division (“MVD”) records attested to only by a computer-generated facsimile signature but which have not been personally inspected by a custodian of records satisfy the requirements of State v. Irving, 165 Ariz. 219, 797 P.2d 1237 (App.1990), and Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 28-110(F) and are therefore admissible. Alternatively, we consider whether…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. FreemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. State v. RomanoskyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. State v. MacUmberArizona Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Norgord v. State Ex Rel. BerningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Rogers v. CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. State v. Hon labianca/pedroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API