Reiter v. Rothschild
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. C. B. Iiebbard, Judge. Action by Catherine Beiter against Joseph Bothschild, executor of Hannah Bothschild, deceased, to recover money deposited by plaintiff with H. Bothschild, whose executrix was Hannah Bothschild. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, C.
Appeal from judgment and order denying new trial. From the findings and undisputed evidence it appears that on December 29, 1886, Henry Bothschild by indenture leased to the plaintiff the premises known as No. 835 on Sacramento street, San Francisco, for the term of three years and five months, beginning January 19, 1887, at a monthly rental of $125. On the same day the parties to the lease executed another instrument in writing, wherein it is recited as follows:
“And whereas, as security for the prompt payment of the rent therein reserved and agreed to be. paid by the said party of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Roach v. CaraffaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gunter v. JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- People v. LavelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Quimby v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anacabe v. First Security BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961