Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Holder
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 17, 2014No. Case No. C14-794 MJPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Merrick Bobb’s Motion to Dismiss on quasi-judicial immunity grounds (Dkt. No. 19) and Defendants City of Seattle, Mayor Ed Murray, and City Attorney Peter Holmes’s Motion to Dis-; miss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 25). Certain represented Plaintiffs re-spondedlo the Motions, while the remaining pro se Plaintiffs failed to respond. Having reviewed the motions, the Represented Plaintiffs’ Responses (Dkt.Nos.36, 59), Defendant Bobb’s Reply (Dkt. No. 54), the City Defendants’ Reply…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert Mahoney v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Iceberg v. OlsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Lilly v. HarrisonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025