Iceberg v. Olson

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 SCOTT F. ICEBERG, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-00422-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 v. DISMISS 13 LAURIE OLSON et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. No. 9. 17 Defendants have filed their motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), contending 18 that Plaintiff Scott Iceberg’s state law torts claims must be dismissed because he did not comply 19 with Washington’s statutory pre-suit notice requirements, and his Section 1983…