Legal Opinion
Application of Barrett
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 9, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5671PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Appellants are dissatisfied with the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 24 through 28 of their application, filed November 2, 1942, for a patent on a process for preparing color composition usable as a coating material, and a novel apparatus for preparing the composition. They appeal from that decision, as provided by R.S. 4911, 35 U.S.C. 59a, 35 U.S.C.A. § 59a.
The application was examined in the Patent Office under the “dual prosecution” procedure in effect prior to November 1948 [present practice is governed by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. R. M. Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Levin v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oxnard Canners, Inc. v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952