Almes v. Burket
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
ORIE MELVIN, J.:
¶ 11 am unable to agree with the Majority that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Appellants’ petition for relief from judgment of non pros. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
¶ 2 The Majority aptly observes that this Court reviews such an order for an abuse of discretion. “The denial of a petition to open and/or strike judgment of non pros is subject to the abuse of discretion standard; an exercise of that discretion will not be reversed on appeal unless there is proof of manifest abuse thereof.” Hoover v. Davila, 862 A.2d 591, 593…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoover v. DavilaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Yee v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Parkway Corp. v. EdelsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Harris v. NeuburgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Warner v. University of Pennsylvania Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.