Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Supply v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 30, 1998No. 974267EPublished

1Opinion of the CourtLauriat, J.

Plaintiff Westinghouse Electric Supply Corporation (“Westinghouse”) has moved to amend its complaint in this action, pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 15(a), to add a jury trial claim. The defendants, Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (“MCAD”) and Mark Chanson (“Chanson”), oppose Westinghouse’s motion. For the following reasons, Westinghouse’s motion to amend its complaint is denied.

BACKGROUND

The facts relevant to this motion may be briefly stated. On March 29, 1990, Chanson filed a discrimination complaint with the MCAD, charging Westinghouse with discrimination based on his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Dalis v. Buyer Advertising, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. DiVenuti v. ReardonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Lavelle v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API