Legal Opinion

Lavelle v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 23, 1997PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

In Dalis v. Buyer Advertising, Inc., 418 Mass. 220 (1994) (Dalis), this court held that a plaintiff alleging gender-based discrimination in a judicial proceeding was entitled, as a matter of State constitutional right, to a trial by jury. Cf. MacCormack v. Boston Edison Co., 423 Mass. 652, 655 (1996) (claimant asserting unlawful retaliation has right to jury trial); Whalen v. NYNEX Info. Resources Co., 419 Mass. 792, 795 (1995) (same for person asserting handicap discrimination). We concluded that art. 15 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights applied to the plaintiff’s sex discrimination…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Labonte v. Hutchins & WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wynn & Wynn, P.C. v. Massachusetts Commission against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. City of Salem v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. City of New Bedford v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. SCI Management Corp. v. SimsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API