Legal Opinion

State v. Kelch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1921No. 16257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered May 14, 1920, upon a trial and conviction of being an habitual criminal.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— The appellant appeals from a conviction and sentence to life imprisonment upon a charge of being an habitual criminal.

Ten assignments of error are made which, con*602densed, are substantially as follows: (1) that, appellant should have been sentenced after being convicted of grand larceny, and before the second information, charging him with being an habitual criminal, was filed; (2) that the court should have quashed the information charging appellant with being an habitual criminal; (3) that the same judge who tried him on the charge of grand larceny should also have tried him on the charge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GustafsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. CotzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. DriscollWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StarrishWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Edelstein v. HunekeWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. MacOmber v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API