Legal Opinion

In Re Carlson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2000No. 98-BG-1491, 99-BG-889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, Glenn H. Carlson, was charged with multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Rules of Professional Conduct, including the prohibitions against misappropriation of funds and intentionally damaging his client. During the pendency of the proceeding before the Board on Professional Responsibility, this court, on petition of the Board, entered an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, on the ground that he “appears to pose a substantial threat of serious harm to the public, based…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In Re HollisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In re OmwengaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API