Legal Opinion

Stricklin v. Rosemeyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1943No. Civ. 12488PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff has appealed from the second

adverse verdict of a jury denying him damages for injuries. On the former appeal this court reversed the judgment for defendants mainly on the error arising from the introduction of a San Francisco traffic ordinance which the Supreme Court in another matter held to he invalid after the trial of the case. (Stricklin v. Rosemeyer, 52 Cal.App.2d 558 [126 P.2d 665].)

The evidence upon which the verdict rests is that plaintiff parked his automobile near the curb in front of his home with the left side of the vehicle facing the street. He opened the left…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hontz v. San Pedro Etc. R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Stricklin v. RosemeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Lagomarsino v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Gardner v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Kaukonen v. AroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API