Legal Opinion

Stricklin v. Rosemeyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1942No. Civ. 11807PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff received personal injuries as a result of being struck by a trolley bus operated by From a judgment for defendants entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. The testimony was in sharp conflict as to the manner in which the collision resulting in plaintiff’s injuries occurred. Plaintiff had parked his automobile in front of his home on the southerly side of Eighteenth Street in San Francisco between Douglass and Eureka Streets. While he was alighting from the left door of his automobile into the street the trolley bus which was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Murphy v. St. Claire Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Lewis v. MemmlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Holman v. VikoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Stricklin v. RosemeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Wooldridge v. MountsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Eggleston v. Broadway-Manhattan Taxicab Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API