Legal Opinion

Marlowe Blake and Pam Blake v. Unionmutual Stock Life Ins. Co. Of America

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 1990No. 89-5334PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Per curiam

Maintaining that additional compensation of $33,269 is due under a group health insurance policy, Marlowe and Pam Blake brought a civil action pursuant to 29 U.S. C.A. § 1132(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 1 The district court held that the insurance company’s responsibility for Pam Blake’s medical bills, which were incurred for extensive psychiatric care related to a postpartum depression, a complication of pregnancy, was limited under the policy’s coverage of mental illness. The Blakes’ claim that postpartum depression is covered under “the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Susan Defelice v. American International Life Assurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Pens. Plan Guide P 23912p James Johnson v. Watts Regulator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Gordon B. Phillips, as Guardian of James G. Phillips v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Dean Borst v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Graham v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API