Graham v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Shirley Graham appeals the district court’s adjudication of her claim for disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. She raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court properly determined that her disability benefits plan with Defendant-Appellee Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. (“Hartford”) did not qualify as a “governmental plan” pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(32); (2) whether the district court properly determined that Graham was not entitled to a jury trial on…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Cardoza v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Berges v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Van Steen v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- C. v. United Healthcare Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.