Legal Opinion
United States v. David Carlson, United States of America v. Carina Leveriza, A/K/A Carina Franz, A/K/A Karen, United States of America v. Walter Franz
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 5, 1996No. 93-3456, 94-2662 and 94-2797PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Defendants David Carlson, Walter A. Franz and Carina Leveriza-Franz (Leveriza) appeal their convictions, and Carlson also appeals his sentence in these consolidated cases. Each pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 813, 841(a) and 846. All defendants contend that 21 U.S.C. §§ 802(32) and 813 are unconstitutionally vague, and that MDMA was neither validly scheduled as a controlled substance nor as a controlled substance analogue under the Analogue Act, 21 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Touby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Joann MitcheltreeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Richard Lester KleckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Jaime PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.