Herfort v. Cramer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to County Court of Lake County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, O. J.
This case is submitted ex parte by plaintiff in error upon a rather meager brief, considering the fact that the points .raised involve important questions of practice.
The first error assigned is, that the court erred in issuing an attachment on an insufficient affidavit.
The affidavit was made under the fourteenth subdivision of the attachment law (Civil Code, 1883, p. 30), and merely states as ground for attachment, that the demand is due on express contract “for the direct payment of money, to wit, upon three several promissory notes now overdue, amounting to the sum of $1,797.50,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eaton, Cole Burnham Co. v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Morse v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Roberts v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Rice v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Hecht v. MetzlerUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Elk River Associates v. HuskinColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- West v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Ponder v. Altura Farms Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.