Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheldon

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1927No. 2940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

A metal condenser and pipes, pipe fittings, coils, valves, pan and malleable iron castings therefor, imported at the port of Chicago, were classified by the collector of customs as articles of metal not specially provided for and assessed for duty at 40 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 399 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:-

399. Articles or wares not specially provided for * * * if composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, lead, copper, brass, nickel, pewter, zinc, aluminum, or other metal, * * * whether…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Standard Milling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. United States v. Moore & McCormack Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Ansonia Copper & Iron Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API