Legal Opinion

Hart v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from municipal court, borough of Brooklyn, Fourth district. Action by Michael Hart against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals

1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.

This action was brought originally in the borough of Manhattan to recover damages for personal injuries. The judgment for the defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, was reversed on appeal, and the case was sent to the Fourth district, borough of Brooklyn, for a new trial, plaintiff having in the meantime become a resident of such district. The defendant interposed a preliminary objection to the trial of the action in the borough of Brooklyn, which was subsequently overruled, urging that'the order made by the appellate term of the supreme court remitting the case to the municipal court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Jersey Steamboat Co. v. BrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Palmeri v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Moore v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Hart v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Printup v. KennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. Greenberg v. AngermanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  4. Kearns v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  5. Arkin v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API