Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Angerman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 22, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan. Action by David Greenberg against Albert M. Angerman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

On the trial of this action, which was begun on December 15, 1902, plaintiff assignor, one Israel Finegold, by a bill of sale dated October 29, 1901, purchased of one Charles Hawes all the fixtures, chattels, and stock of merchandise in a store at 1359 Second avenue; that on November 29, 1901, the defendant, a city marshal, came into the store, and, claiming to have a “judgment” against one Isaac Finegold, seized upon $15 in cash in the money drawer, demanded the balance due on the judgment, and began to pack up the goods preparatory to removing the same. Plaintiff’s assignor thereupon paid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Hart v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adorff v. BechterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API