Legal Opinion
K-LAK Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 3, 2010No. 09-771CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the motion filed by the defendant (“government”) to dismiss this action brought pursuant to the court's bid protest jurisdiction as governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2006). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, K-LAK Corp. (“K-LAK”) was an incumbent contractor providing credit reports at a cost of $3.80 each to the United States Department of the Air Force (“Air Force”) under a one-year contract (No. FA 3089-08-P-0018, effective October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008) awarded as a direct…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- K-LAK Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Transatlantic Lines LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- M. Nicolas Enterprises, Llc.United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.