Legal Opinion
K-LAK Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 9, 2011No. 09-771CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In this action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2006), the plaintiff challenges the government’s September 2008 decision to procure credit reports using the Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) rather than continue its procurement pursuant to the requirement it had set aside for small businesses in 2007. The plaintiff was the small business incumbent providing credit reports before its contract expired in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Pai Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- International Genomics Consortium v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Constellation West, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Pricewaterhousecoopers Public Sector, LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.