Legal Opinion

WAGNER Et Ux. v. ANDERSON

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1952No. 7761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

The appellants, as sellers, and the respondent, as buyer, entered into an agreement for the sale and purchase of certain real property in Salt Lake City, Utah. Upon the date set for performance in the contract, the respondent refused to perform and the appellants instituted this action to obtain specific performance of the agreement, to recover special damages sustained by them because of that respondent’s refusal, and to recover a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to the terms of the contract. After the suit was commenced the respondent notified the appellants that he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Rickenberg v. Capitol GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Fowler v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frampton v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mills v. Southwest Builders, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Barker v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. WAGNER Et Ux. v. ANDERSONUtah Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API