Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Derschug

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

Plaintiff charges that, due to the fraud and misrepresentation of the defendant, he was induced to purchase, for an investment, 3,350 shares of class “ B ” common stock of the Syracuse Washing Machine Corporation for which he paid $215,000, to his damage in the sum of $185,000.

In his complaint he alleges that defendant represented the “ true and actual value ” of the stock was in excess of the then selling price on the market. On the trial plaintiff testified that the representation was that the “ book value ” was in excess of its then selling price. To this testimony defendant objected as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McEntyre v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Miranda v. WitteNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gordon v. KrellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Kent v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Kelly v. HilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. DerschugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. In re County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. O'Hara v. DerschugNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API