Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 14, 1990No. ACM 28675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Technical Sergeant Taylor complains that there is no indication in the record that he receipted for his copy of the staff judge advocate’s recommendation in accordance with R.C.M. 1106(f)(1). See also Air Force Regulation 111-1, Military Justice Guide, para. 15-6 (30 September 1988). An affidavit from a paralegal technician assigned to the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate of the convening authority confirms that Taylor indeed was served with that document.1 We find his complaint without merit.

Another matter detains us. For reasons not otherwise explained, Taylor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ScolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. WestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. BlockerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. GentileUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. RayfordU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API