United States v. Gentile
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*463OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The accused’s persistent threats to remove his clothing in the presence of the court members if he were forced to stand trial in a military uniform prompted the military judge to order the accused handcuffed. Appellant now contends that he was deprived of a fair and impartial trial as a result of the judge’s order.
As a general proposition, an accused is entitled to appear at his trial free from physical restraint. Way v United States, 285 F2d 253 (10th Cir 1960); State v Roberts, 86 NJ Super 159, 206 A2d 200 (1965). That general rule must yield where an individual disrupts…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. WestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. TaylorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990