Legal Opinion

Wahad v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 1, 1998No. 75 CIV. 6203 MJLPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LOWE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) (“Rule 15(a)”), to amend the Fourth Amended Complaint. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks to add a cause of action for violations of his due process rights under Section 6 of Article I of the New York State Constitution. Defendants City of New York and Michael Codd (collectively referred to herein as “Municipal Defendants”) oppose the motion. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

The Court assumes familiarity with the facts of this case, see…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Stanley Cohen, Gerald A. Garfinkle, Eastern Artists and Drafting Materials, Inc. v. Elliott Koenig, and Robert KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Brown v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ying Li v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  2. Biswas v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Alwan v. City of N.Y.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  4. Muhammad v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  5. Coakley v. JaffeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API