CPF Agency Corp. v. Sevel's 24 Hour Towing Service
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
Plaintiff CPF Agency Corp., on behalf of itself and the general public, sued Sevel’s 24 Hour Towing Service (defendant), alleging defendant overcharged vehicle owners for vehicle storage fees in violation of Vehicle Code section 22658, subdivision (i)(2)1 and also failed to comply with section 22851.12, which imposes limitations on a tow operator’s right to charge hen sale preparation fees on towed vehicles. The court sustained defendant’s demurrers to plaintiff’s causes of action for fraud, negligence per se and violations of California’s unfair competition law (Bus. &…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cheong Yu Yee v. Don CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kunde v. SeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Summers v. Colette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Chawanakee Unified School District v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Weatherspoon v. Tillery Body Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.