Legal Opinion

Teter v. Shultz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1942No. 16,789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlessing, J.

This action was begun by the appellant to collect the balance due on a note of $860, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing said note, both of which instruments were signed by all of the appellees. To appellant’s complaint the appellees filed an answer of general denial and a second paragraph alleging total failure of consideration, partial failure of consideration, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, and violation of plaintiff’s guaranty. The appellees also filed a counterclaim in which they alleged that the note sued on was given for the purchase price of certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Hitz v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Diddel v. American Security Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Pitcairn v. HonnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Pigg v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. General Foods Corporation v. Valley Lea Dairies, Inc. And Lyons Creamery Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. General Foods Corporation v. Valley Lea Dairies, Inc. And Lyons Creamery Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API