Autohaus, Inc. v. Aguilar
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURNETT, Justice.
Autohaus, Inc., appeals an adverse judgment in favor of Raul Aguilar on his claim arising under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA). Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-17.63 (Vernon 1987 & Vernon Supp.1990). In four points of error, Autohaus contends that: (1) there was no evidence or insufficient *460evidence to show that it represented to Aguilar that an automobile had certain characteristics, ingredients, uses, and benefits which it did not have; (2) there was no evidence or insufficient evidence to show that it represented to Aguilar that an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Woods v. LittletonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Hedley Feedlot, Inc. v. Weatherly Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
- Humble National Bank v. DCV, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.