Kelso v. Woodruff
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sued defendant for $100, and obtained judgment in justice's and circuit court.
His claim is based upon the following facts: William. *300H. Stevens had the apparent title to certain property in the city of Detroit, which he obtained by sale under a chattel mortgage given him by Baker & Shefferly. The property consisted of machinery and fixtures used in a sash, door, and blind factory and planing mill. Stevens took possession of it, putting the defendant in charge. Plaintiff was employed as a book-keeper for Stevens. At the time the contract was made between plaintiff and defendant,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morley v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Douville v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Wasylux v. LubienskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Farmer v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Moore v. . HarkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.