Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bliss

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1982No. 13665PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

The Bennetts, as sellers, brought this suit on a land sales contract, contending the purchasers were in default. The district court granted the summary judgment motions of respondents, the purchasers, and denied Bennett’s motion for summary judgment. Bennett’s appeal raises two issues: First, did the court err by granting the purchasers an extension of time for the hearing on Bennett’s motion for summary judgment? Second, did the district court properly rule on the respective requests for summary judgment? We affirm the summary judgment granted to the purchasers.

In 1976…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Clark v. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance CompaniesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Beal v. Mars Larsen Ranch Corp., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Palmer v. Idaho Bank & Trust of KooskiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Argyle v. SlemakerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Country Cove Development, Inc. v. MayIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. Rubbermaid Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kugler v. DrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API