Legal Opinion

Awsienko v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0376PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KESSLER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Halina, Nina, and Oleg Awsienko (the “Awsienkos”) appeal the superior court’s summary judgments in favor of Defendants/Appellees David Hoelzinger, M.D. and Robert Steven Cohen, D.O. We affirm the judgment in favor of Dr. Hoelzinger. However, we reverse the judgment in favor of Dr. Cohen because we hold that pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 12-2604(A)(1) (Supp. 2010), an expert witness testifying against a board-certified specialist in a medical malpractice action need not be board-certified in the same specialty…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare, Wittman, Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Preston v. AmadeiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Mikel Lo, M.D. and Mikel W. Lo, M.d, Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API