Legal Opinion

Jones v. Radatz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1880PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The plaintiff, claiming to be a Iona fide' holder, brings suit on an instrument in the following form:

“$135. P. O. St. Paul, County of Bamsey, ) State of Minnesota, September 7, 1878. )
“Three months after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay to H. K. White & Co., or bearer, $135, payable at the Second National Bank of St. Paul, Minnesota, for value received, with 12 per cent, interest per annum, from date, and! reasonable attorney’s fees, if suit be instituted for the collection of this note.” [Signed.]

The defendants allege that their execution of the instrument was procured through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sperry v. HorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Stebbins v. LardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Deering v. ThomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Chase v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API