Legal Opinion

State v. . Lowe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Conceding that the recent possession .of the stolen automobile (if, indeed, the evidence establishes such possession, which may be doubted) was a circumstance tending to show the larceny thereof by the defendant (S. v. Best, 202 N. C., 9, 161 S. E., 535), still it is the holding with us that the inference or presumption arising from the recent possession of stolen property, without more, does not extend to the statutory charge (C. S., 4250) of receiving said property knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken. S. v. Adams, 133 N. C., 667, 45 S. E., 553.

There was not sufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. State v. . BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. NeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. . YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API