Legal Opinion
State v. O'NEAL
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2008No. 27,751PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant Richard O’Neal appeals the district court’s denial of his pretrial motion to dismiss for violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We address (1) whether Defendant waived that constitutional right and (2) whether the right was violated. We hold that Defendant did not waive his constitutional right to a speedy trial but that the right was not violated. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss for violation of his right to a speedy trial.
BACKGROUND
{2} Defendant was arrested for driving while…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. ValenciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. FierroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.