Tower v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrenoe, Judge:
This case presents for our consideration the proper classification of an imported commodity described on the commercial invoices as “Abrasive Sludge 81.” It was classified by the collector of customs under the provision for—
*47Ferrosilicon, containing 8 per centum or more of silicon and less than 80 per centum.
and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 1 cent per pound on the silicon contained therein under paragraph 302 (i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and Canada, effective January 1, 1939, 74 Treas. Dec. 235, T. D.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- United States v. TowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952