Legal Opinion
Spahn v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 27, 2017No. 09-386VPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
' Petitioner, Forrest Q. Spahn, seeks review of the September 11, 2014, decision of the special master denying his claim for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). Petitioner alleges that the tetanus-diphtheria (“Td”) vaccine that he received on June 19, 2007, significantly aggravated his obsessive-compulsive disorder (“OCD”). Petitioner also seeks review of the October 29, 2014, decision of the special master granting-in-part and denying-in-part petitioner’s…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bishara v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Braun v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Frantz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Jennings v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Pickens v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.