Legal Opinion
Village of Kenesaw v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1912No. 16,750PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Harry S. Buxgan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
This is an action to enjoin the defendant railroad company from maintaining stock-yards at the place where they are now situated in the village of Kenesaw.
The trial court found that the stock-yards “are located in or near the center of said village of Kenesaw, in the thickly settled portion thereof; that they are adjacent to the main business street of said Aúlla ge and about 40 feet therefrom, the entrance to said yards, pens and inclosures being about 80 feet from said street; that the same are kept in as good a condition as they can he kept, considering the purposes for Avhich they are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. Pacific Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Lonoke v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- City of Ottumwa v. ChinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Hickory v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- City of Red Wing v. GuptilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Syracuse v. Farmers Elevator, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Sarraillon v. StevensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Omaha v. DannerNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Monroe City v. ArnoldUtah Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.